Free Web Hosting Provider - Web Hosting - E-commerce - High Speed Internet - Free Web Page
Search the Web


Home Back Pages Illustrations Author Interview Back Pages People
WebCam! CamGallery Way Backpages What is a Backpage?

September, 2000


Friday, September 8th 2000

I'm in a very odd mood tonight. I think, in long-past and darker days it would have been a depressed night. The kind of night I'd lie on the apartment floor, shivering, unable to move. All night and into the next day. I'm not in nearly so dark a mood today, thank goodness, but I'm having a little trouble experiencing the world in positive terms. No worries, dear readers. Nothing dramatic is happening, I'm not loosing Brent and I'm not going to impale myself in ceremonial suicide. I'm simply stating that I'm looking at the world through an odd filter tonight.

The day started well enough. As the school's new Alumni Relations Director, I woke up very early (5:45 a.m.) to watch one of our alumni, Scott Altman, pilot the Space Shuttle Atlantis into orbit. I interviewed him last month and had an article about his flight published in the Campus News yesterday. On board Atlantis, stowed with the checklists, is a single sheet of paper I printed out in my office with the school's crest and name spelled out on it. Altman will pose on the flight deck with it for a photo, and it will be strategically placed in the background when the crew does a TV interview with ABC's Good Morning America next Thursday. A nice little media coup for me to impress my new bosses with! I'm also tickled by the idea that all my college friends in Aerospace Engineering who studied their butts off in college while I was having fun studying Management have probably never designed something that has actually flown in space. I have. It came right out of my printer.

Another reason I shouldn't be in a funk is tomorrow. Tomorrow I'll be out at the race track watching the Champ Cars race - open-wheels, turbochargers, slick tires, wings, and 180mph speeds on the hills and twists of Laguna Seca! I love this stuff. Tomorrow will be qualifying for the race on Sunday. The race will be live on ESPN for those who care to watch. It's not that phony NASCAR stuff with the good 'ole boys.

In addition to some very talented drivers (talented, but not the world's best. They're in Monza, Italia this week, contesting the F1GP of Italy - Forza Ferrari!!) and very fast cars, the weather is usually nice and I get to see some very cute boys in shorts. Last year, I made highlights page of some of the cuties I saw at the track. Any readers in favor of Cute Guys at the Track 2?

Hmmmm. Actually, just writing about the good things that are going on around here seems to have cheered me up. I'm in a much better mood now than an hour ago when I started this. Thanks, dear readers, for being there for me!

Wednesday, September 13th 2000


Well, it seems I'm back. But for how long? Thanks to all of you who inquired during the time my page went, as Mickey so colorfully put it, 'poof!', with concern over my demise, but as Clemmens said, the rumors of my death were greatly exaggerated. I guess the pioneers at Xoom are all patting themselves on the back and planning vacations on Aruba now that they've sold to NBC (see Howard Stern's movie Private Parts to get the correct pronunciation of 'nBc') and become astronomically wealthy before their twenty-fifth birthday.

I'm very happy and proud that my incessant effort to provide fine written and image content for free to Xoom has made their lives so much more joyful. But, I think, owing to their absence (vacationing in Aruba) and subsequent poofing of my pages, my work here is done. I need to give another web host the opportunity to make me crazy while I provide them with outstanding content. I haven't narrowed down the search completely yet, but I've found two providers of free space that are good, and I'm considering buying a space and a domain name so that I'll never be plagued with this problem again. Trouble is, I'm going to be in debt over the Rainier trip for a while and I just can't shell out the three-hundred bucks that my host of choice wants.

I spent the weekend at the race track as I said I would last time. The race was good, and no one was killed or even seriously injured. You may remember I was quite saddened by a fatal accident at this race last year. Nice weather, not too hot, not too cold. The fog was blowing around the hills on Saturday, so I didn't think about putting on sunscreen. I regretted that a few hours later when unobstructed sun shone for the rest of the day.

My new job is still great fun, now in it's third week. Did I mention what an incredible office I've got now? No more computer cave! Now I'm in a ground floor suite of two offices. The building I'm in is what's really incredible. It's a former 1920's luxury hotel. The architecture is very nice and I've got huge windows that open out into beautiful manicured lawns and gardens. It's like working on a noble estate. Naturally, it appeals to me. I swear I was some member of the peerage in a recent past life. I want to kick all the commoners out of the building and move in with Brent, then hire a staff of 100, plus a butler to be called Jeeves.

Not too much longer after writing this entry I'm going to head over to Brent's house and get some dinner ready for when he gets home. It's our favorite night of T.V. with two shows to watch - Good Eats! and Southpark. Brent won't actually come in from work until 8:30 p.m. I'll have an hour or two to kill before then, so I'm going to try to pick up a video tape of Sunday's Grand Prix of Italy from Stuart. I've not watched it yet, so no Emailing the results and spoiling the excitement for me please!

OK, one last thing for today. As a contingency, in case Xoom poofs my page forever, write down my ICQ number. ICQ has a little communications page for all their members. When I get my new site up and running, I'll link to it from the ICQ member page so you can find me! Or, you could always just ask my good friend Bryan since that is what many of you seem to have done anyways. That little brat is more POPULAR than me! BTW, I want everyone to send Bryan a joke or a card because he's feeling a little overwhelmed right now and needs some support.

Wednesday, September 14th 2000


I'm getting a little political again here. I'm not very happy with the job that our two parties are doing for us. I don't think there's anything in the Constitution that requires a two-party system. There's nothing in it that defines the national conventions, nothing in it that defines the Congressional committee structure, nothing in it the says how a bill gets to the floor for a vote.

It was during the Reagan administration that the two-party system really stopped working for America. Reagan's appeal and popularity sprung largely from the fact he was an ideologue. His style, and the advent of politically active American Protestantism, made all national politics become polarized. Compromise for the sake of good governance fell by the wayside when national leaders were accused of selling out principals and ideals if they did. That climate made government by consensus impossible.

Unfortunately, the U.S. is suffering for its excess of idealism. With only two parties' fixed ideals to choose from, a vast spectrum of opinion and wisdom is ignored. Minority party ideas can't become law even if they're supported by 49% of Americans (and sometimes more!) because of the political process. The polarization of politics means that one representative's ideas mean nothing. Only the ideas of the party national leadership can become law. It's not good for America that for some ideas to be supported there has to be a change of ruling party. 'Ruling party'? That doesn't even sound like America, does it?

A good example is what happened to HR 4892 bill, 'Scouting for All' this week. It was sponsored by a Democrat who thought it wasn't a good idea for Congress to charter the Boy Scouts because of their legal right to discriminate against homosexuals. The congressional charter is substantively meaningless, but rather symbolic. And that's how the ruling party used it. Rather than allow the normal weeks of committee process in which the bill's sponsor could have argued for support, the Speaker surprised the sponsors brought the bill immediately to the floor for vote, where he had his majority party marshaled against it.

The Republican's characterized the bill as a disloyal attack on America. Representative John Hostettler (R-Ind.) went even farther, projecting the move as the first step towards a future in which the Bible could not be quoted without the speaker being punished for hate speech, and declared, "The minute we forsake the Boy Scouts will be the beginning of the demise of this great country." Representative Robin Hayes (R-N.C.) said, "This ridiculous legislation is meant to shame an organization just because it does not conform to the extreme left wing's view of the world." Representative Chris Cannon (R-Utah) called it "an attack on the fundamental values of America... [led by] a small group of extremists on the minority side."

I would hardly characterize civil rights as an extreme left-wing idea. I would regard it as a radical abuse by religious extremists if the Bible were used as a basis for secular law in America.

Recognizing that they had been ambushed and couldn't get the bill passed, the Democrats in the House were present but abstained from the vote. I wonder how the vote would have gone if each member had voted his or her own conscious instead of the dictates of the old Party cronies. I'll bet the Boy Scouts would have received another black eye for the shameful decisions of their leadership.

Wednesday, September 20th 2000


First, a little housekeeping. It's been painfully apparent that Xoom/NBCi are not treating me very well. I've accepted the ads for the last few years since at least there weren't pop-ups involved. The service and availability of my pages has been the real problem. They just can't seem to keep their web server running. Or if not that, then their FTP server doesn't run and I can't update or turn on my cam. I've been shopping for a new host, and I've almost settled on one. I'll probably try to set up my site on two or more competing servers and keep them all synchronized for a week or two. Then I'll make a decision about which one I like best. I'll let you all know where the sites are, if you care to offer a little feedback too.

My good friends Mickey and Zup have been journaling a little more often the last week than they have most of the summer. I wonder what has precipitated that? Coincidence? Both are waxing introspective in a way that makes great reading and, I think, is valuable to them too. Although they don't quite use the same words, nor do they have the same impetus, I think both of my friends are sharing similar, if independent, thoughts.

I think I recognize this in (or perhaps read this into) their writing because it touches on themes that have dominated my life for the last few years. In broad, philosophical, terms the questions they are grappling with are manifestations of existential angst. They are asking the Universe "why am I here?" and "what should I do with my life?". The fact that the Universe does not come back with any obvious answers is a disturbing feeling.

Many people fill this yearning for answers and direction with faith. They arbitrarily believe an answer, not because it makes any sense, but because it satisfies the yearning, it makes the Angst go away, it feels good. I can't do that. 'Because' is not an answer for me. 'I don't know' is a far more satisfactory response, I think. Zup and Mickey have debated the idea of faith with me before, as have others. They each have their faith, but I'm not convinced that they are fully satisfied by the (as I see them, hollow) answers their faiths provide.

Both Andy(Zup) and Mickey are both finding it difficult and stressful to commit to a path in life, a goal, and then do what it takes to achieve it. If you look at things linearly, choosing one path means excluding all others. To intelligent people like Mickey and Andy, excluding so many possibilities for the sake of one seems like a terrible waste.

Out of desire not to waste possibilities, it is actually possible to let a decade slip by without having done anything. That's an appalling 20% of your adult life with no purpose nor direction nor accomplishment. Ten years of asking yourself "what should I do? What am I here for?" Ten years you do not get back. You could wind up wasting all the possibilities out of fear of choosing one.

I think I've finally started to find a way out of the conundrum in the last few years. I do not believe in a supreme being that demands a certain behavior of me or assigns me an arbitrary purpose, but I am a little closer to accepting 'because' as an answer. If there is no heavenly mandate of purpose to human life, then why not make one of your personal goals to simply be happy? An overarching but simple goal like that doesn't exclude all others, does it? Doesn't it rather encompass most others? I'm not sure of my logic, and maybe this is a place that logic can't go. Maybe only a gentle, abiding awareness of being leads to such an idea.

Oh, bother! This is all coming out sounding new-agey and stupid. I just can't find the words to express this idea that I so badly want to share. I could go on spouting lots of stock, off-the-rack phrases, but what's the use? By analogy, I'm struggling to communicate a ten dimensional idea with only three perceptible dimensions to express it in. I'm going to have to find another approach. This isn't working and it's making me look funny.

Friday, September 22nd 2000


Today is a bright new day for motorsports in America. The first United States Formula One Grand Prix since 1991 began with open practice this morning. The race is being held on a twisty circuit purpose-built in the infield of the famed Indianapolis Motor Speedway. The F1 circuit even uses a portion of the venerable banked oval. U.S. citizens don't tend to have much interest in world-class competition except for the Olympic Games. Since the Olympic Games are being staged the same weekend as the USGP, I don't think many casual international sports fans will be watching the Grand Prix. Oh, but you know I will! Fox Sports and SpeedVision are both showing live coverage of today's practice, tomorrow's qualifying, and Sunday's race. For you international readers, that's a lot of coverage for an F-1 event here. Normally we just get a tape delayed, 2 hour packaged and edited, race on Sunday.

My friend Julie called yesterday! She moved to the extreme northern end of California to run the office for her family's nut orchard business at the end of spring. I've missed her since that time, but especially now as the ski season draws near. As well as being a good friend, she was one of the best guides in the program. True to form, during our conversation she asked me if we had any hot new young guides in the training program - meaning guys, of course.

I like being asked questions like that off the cuff. It makes me feel like it's perfectly natural for me to be sexually attracted to other guys. It is perfectly natural for me, damnit! I really like it when my friends acknowledge that fact in an open, friendly, and casual way. Most of the time I hear only noisy righteous rhetoric that my basic nature is, in fact, an unnatural, sick, moral perversion. Having straight friends couch my orientation in positive, assumed terms is very validating. It's also just plain fun to get to conspire and gossip with like-minded friends about which boys are cute and which aren't. For most of my closeted life, that is a pastime I could only jealously watch my friends enjoy.

I couldn't, however, answer Julie's question. The new guide training hasn't started yet. I won't see any of them until next Tuesday. I'm hoping there's some good male eye-candy in the bunch just so I can call Julie back and make her jealous. I'm sooooo cruel!

Wednesday, September 27th 2000


I can't blame this one on Xoom. It seems I wrote an update at the end of last week and then forget to ftp it to the server. Sorry, dear readers, I'll try to pay better attention to my work than that in future.

Attention all friends of Bryan! It's time to email him again, this time with a get-well card. He's managed to break his ankle rather seriously. He'll kill me for telling you all this, but I owe him a little embarrassment, so I'll reveal that he is in a fair amount of pain, and he is worried about how he's going to survive the semester whilst immobile. Those who know Bryan will know he's going to get through the ordeal, but I think it would be nice if all of his 'net friends support him. He'll prolly have more access to web friends than IRL friends for a little while.

The Grand Prix of the United States went very well over the weekend. I joined several of my racing friends at Stuart's house for the race. We made breakfast burritos (is that a CA thing?) and drank mimosas while watching the race coverage on Sunday morning. The great German driver Michael Schumacher won the race in a Ferrari. As I mentioned earlier in the year, I'm hoping he'll go on to win the World Championship. By winning the USGP he regained the lead by a narrow margin over his championship rival, Mikka Hakkinen of Finland. There are two races left in the season, the Grands Prix of Japan and Maylasia.

Did I mention I love my new job? Not only do I get to write and edit the alumni magazine and maintain the alumni database, I also get to plan an organize alumni events. I've got several such events coming up soon. The first is Fleet Week in San Francisco. I'll visit with many of our alumni aboard Navy ships in San Francisco, and host them at a beautiful bay front private club on Saturday afternoon. The entertainment will be a performance by the Blue Angles, as viewed from the rooftop garden of the club. There is also a chance we could arrive in SF in style by flying from Monterey to an aircraft carrier as it passes by my hometown on it's way north to SF from San Diego. We'd ride the ship overnight to SF, then steam under the Golden Gate as part of the Fleet Week parade of ships. Details on that later as they develop.

But wait, with this job you get more! At the end of October, I'm scheduled to fly to Houston for a science writing conference. To leverage the trip, I'm arranging to visit the Johnson Space Center to meet with several of our astronaut alumni - there are 19 of them at the moment. Altman I'd really like to meet with Scott Altman who just came back from a mission on Atlantis to the Space Station last week. He carried a little NPS (Naval Postgraduate School) sign I made for him into space. My goal is get our astronaut and NASA engineer alumni at JSC to form a little alumni club. Believe it or not, this school I work at has never really had much of an alumni program - we only have three active chapters.

I've also got two trips to San Diego scheduled for this Fall. There is a conference for education advancement professionals there that I'll be attending in early December. Before that, in mid-October, I'll be officiating a car race there. My friends Stuart and Carrie (and little baby Stirling), and Mark will be traveling with me on that trip to work the race too.

Speaking of Mark, I was giving him a hard time at the ski tour guide's meeting last night. He's got a nasty case of laryngitis and can't speak at all. He's been going around communicating by means of clicks, whistles, and gestures for the last two days. It's very cute and adorable and I've been reminding him of that as much as possible in front of other people! Poor guy can't defend himself. Like I said at the end of my last entry, I'm soooooo cruel! I've always identified with the Tigger, but maybe there's a little Mickey in me too, eh Michael?

Thursday, September 28th 2000


"I don't think we should legalize marijuana. I do not believe marijuana has any medicinal use."

                                                -Al Gore, Sept. 2000

I'm really having trouble with this political season. Look at what Vice President Gore said this week. The first part is an honest opinion that could be based on many things. Although I disagree with the opinion, I would give the VP the benefit of the doubt that it was well-considered as he formed it. The second sentence I also disagree with, but the thought process it implies is far more troubling than the conclusion.

Al Gore is a professional politician, not a scientist or a medical professional. Yet, if he becomes President, his 'belief' about a matter of fact will set national policy. A man who will govern based on what he chooses to believe in the face of available fact is simply unfit to be President. Yes, the facts on this particular issue are available. Earlier in the Clinton Administration the White House Drug Czar Barry McCaffrey commissioned the Institute of Medicine of the National Academy of Sciences to report on the subject of medicinal marijuana. The Institute's scientists studied the question thoroughly and reported in 1999, "Cannabinoids are an interesting group of compounds with potentially far-reaching therapeutic applications." You may read the entire report if you like, but it's long and dry.

I'd like to emphasize here the reason that I'm very disturbed by what Al Gore said. It has nothing to do with my opinion on the use of marijuana. I'm not a marijuana user, and I don't think I would become one if it were made legal for recreational use. I'm concerned about Gore's complete disregard of rational thought.

Before I started writing today, I wasn't sure about the validity of medicinal marijuana, although I have seen it used (by a college friend's mother with terminal bone cancer) to the great benefit of the patient. I did a quick web-search to find out if my notion was even remotely correct and came up with the facts reported by the IOM in less than five minutes.

Not only was the truth out there, it was easy to find! The Whitehouse itself commissioned the conclusive study showing the medicinal potential of marijuana. What kind of man is Al Gore to choose to ignore the hard facts - facts the administration he works for paid money to learn - and instead choose to base his proposed national policy on an incorrect belief? Al Gore is not the kind of man I would call Presidential material.

Friday, September 29th 2000


R.I.P Oreo 1997-2000

Whenever a debating society is looking for a good ethical issue to debate they turn first to abortion. With this week's USFDA decision to approve the use of the abortion pill in the United States, you might think I'd pick that as a subject to share my thoughts on, but I'm going to move down the list of debater's topics one or two places and discuss euthanasia instead. It has immediate relevance. I had my pet rat Oreo euthanized this morning.

Most of this entry is plagiarized from a letter I wrote to a friend about it, shortly after it happened. I needed to get my story off my chest so I wrote to him. Re-reading the letter this afternoon, it seemed like something that should be in my journal for my own personal record. I loved Oreo and I'm certainly not pleased with his death, but I am proud of the decisions I made leading up to it. I'm convinced I did everything right for my little furry companion.

The most common cause of death in rats is pneumonia. Whiskers died of pneumonia last year. Oreo had it this spring, but responded well to oral antibiotics and lived happily on. Yesterday morning, it had returned with a vengeance. I woke up to find Oreo lying helplessly by his food dish, unconscious.

I took him to see the vet who then prescribed the normal oral antibiotic that Oreo really likes the taste of. Unfortunately, just as in the case of mountaineers at high altitude, the lack of oxygen in Oreo's blood ruined his appetite. Forcing him to take the medicine was an awful trauma for him. Likewise, he responded very stressfully to an attempted sub-coetaneous fluid injection. I took him home and hoped that what little antibiotic he took would help his breathing enough to return his appetite, so he would take his morning dose more readily.

Oreo had a terrible night. Every time he'd start to drift off to sleep, he'd snap back to awakeness with a nasty start because he was suffocating. By this morning he hadn't slept, ate, or drank in 24 hours and was lying in his cage gasping like a beached fish.

I took him back to the vet's and suggested putting him in an Oxygen tent for a half an hour or so, like you might do with an O2 starved mountaineer, to see if that would restore his appetite enough to take some medicine. It didn't. Since Oreo's recovered from pneumonia once before, he's probably got badly scarred lungs. He's also 3.5 years old and most rats only go 2-3 years. The vet said that injected antibiotics might give him a chance, but it was a small one. I already knew how much Oreo didn't like injections.

I decided that I didn't want Oreo's most likely last days and hours to be spent tortured by needles and suffering without even the respite of sleep. I asked that he be comfortably put to sleep. They were going to give him a lethal injection, but then I reminded them of how sensitive he was to injections, and I didn't want that to be his last experience. They put some cat surgical anesthesia in his oxygen tent so that he'd go to sleep, then painlessly gave him the final injection.

I was very sad and cried a little, but I didn't feel bad or guilty. I knew I did the best thing for Oreo. My ethics were put to painful test today, and I'm proud of how I measured up. I'll bury Oreo next to his departed brother Whiskers.

After work tonight, my friends will join me at the campus pub. Julie, who moved north, will be there visiting too. We'll wake Oreo properly, you can be sure of that!